Not too
many years ago, the people of The United States of America looked upon Russia
as a place where freedom and fairness was a very rare commodity. We heard
stories of numerous checkpoints people had to endure and submit too, as they
traveled from one area of their country to another.13% FLAT TAX NOW IN EFFECT
Now it
is the citizens of the United States who are forced to produce many documents
at random checkpoints, as they drive around their local cities and rural areas.
If you can’t show a valid drivers license, proof of insurance, a current car
tag, state inspection stickers, and registration papers, you may very well be
subject to being arrested in many states. Even when Russia was a full fledged
communist nation, the citizens were not required to have as many documents available
for examination in their motor vehicles as we now do in America.
To add
insult to injury, even our founding fathers would have to admit the tax system
in Russia is fairer, and less invasive of our privacy, than the current tax
system in Russia. The article below tell it like it is, and every American
system who has stood by and allowed our government to rob us of our basic
constitutional freedoms should hang their head on shame.
Charles
Gleason
3/4/2002
Russians
Do Taxes Right
The
flat tax, Russian style.
Mr.
Murdock is a columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service.
March
1, 2002 8:00 a.m.
Once
again, American taxpayers are struggling to complete their tax returns. They
will pay accountants and attorneys some $140 billion this year to generate
paperwork to accompany their checks to the IRS. The 46,900-page U.S. Tax Code
governs the whole process, with enough loopholes to lasso a light breeze.
Too bad
this isn't Russia.
Since
January 1, 2001, Russians have enjoyed a 13 percent flat tax. That's right. The
once-Communist superpower now stands to the right of publisher Steve Forbes on
taxes. The former GOP presidential contender staunchly advocates a 17 percent
flat tax.
"Sometimes
philosophical seeds fall on interesting ground," Forbes says. "After
Marxism, which was the philosophical equivalent of the IRS code, something
understandable has obvious appeal."
The old
Russian system featured three income-tax rates: 12, 20, and 30 percent. The top
rate kicked in at the ruble equivalent of $5,000 in taxable income. In
contrast, the U.S. has six tax rates: 10, 15, 27, 30, 35, and 38.6 percent, the
last of which takes hold at $307,500 for married couples filing jointly.
Russia's
single-rate tax is reasonable and comprehensible. Most important, the Russian
government no longer uses graduated tax brackets to punish those whose incomes
improve. Americans should be so lucky.
After
just one year, the results of this law already look positive. As Hoover
Institution scholar Alvin Rabushka observes in a February 21 analysis for
www.russiaeconomy.org, "the 13 percent flat tax has exceeded the
expectations of the government in terms of revenue. For the vast majority of
taxpayers, its implementation is simple, and no forms need to be filed."
Adjusting for currency fluctuations, Rabushka adds, "real ruble revenues
increased about 28 percent."
This
initiative "is establishing the custom of paying taxes in Russia,"
senior Duma member Dr. Konstantin Remchukov told me over lunch last fall.
"It's greatly simplified everything." He says that three years ago,
tax revenue equaled 9 to 10 percent of Russian GDP. By last November, that
number had grown to 16 percent. This follows the supply-side Laffer Curve:
Lower marginal tax rates produce higher revenues as both new and previously
concealed economic activities enter the tax base. No wonder Russia's GDP grew 5
percent in 2001.
"There
was a huge, monstrous non-compliance problem with the old system," says
Dr. Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economics professor and board member of
the National Taxpayers Union. "People essentially operated in the
underground economy. There were a lot of payments in kind where people were not
paid in cash but in goods to facilitate tax evasion. That problem, from what I
understand, has not totally disappeared but has dramatically declined in the
last year or two."
Beyond
the flat tax, President Vladimir Putin has signed legislation to chop the
corporate tax from 35 percent to 24 percent, effective last January 1. Putin
hurled the double taxation of corporate income onto the ash heap of history.
The Kremlin also may offer Russians privately invested social-security
accounts, much as President Bush wants for Americans. Thanks to actual and
potential reforms, Putin expects the average Russian to "be happy" by
2010.
In two
former Soviet socialist republics, meanwhile, flat-rate taxes fuel progress.
Since 1994, Estonia has had a flat tax of 26 percent while Latvia has enjoyed a
25 percent flat tax since 1995. Both have stimulated growth and higher
revenues.
While
ex-Communist states confidently reject progressive taxation, America remains
plagued by Marxian class-warfare rhetoric. A May 28, 2000 New York Times
editorial praised the Russian flat tax's promise to reduce "political
corruption, removing layers of subsidies in the code that officials like to
shower on favored constituents." However, the previous October 30,
Republicans for a U.S. flat tax were "disingenuous, when the basic result
would ease the tax burden on the super-rich," the Gray Old Lady screeched,
her dainty fist clenched overhead.
Senate
Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D., South Dakota) complained January 4 that
Republicans "have one unchanging, unyielding solution that they offer for
every problem: tax cuts that go disproportionately to the most affluent."
Analyzing
all this from his dacha in Hell, V. I. Lenin must be stroking his beard in
utter bewilderment.
Of
course, the country that Lenin once misruled still must do plenty to unravel
his legacy. Stronger private property rights, a rule of law and full respect
for free speech are sorely needed. But with its 13 percent flat tax, Russia now
has a far more impressive export than those interlocking, wooden matrioschka
dolls.
return to:
END OF PAGE